RSS feed Add to your Facebook page LinkedIn Watch us on Youtube

Activity title

Human Capability & Survivability Enhancement: Augmenting people to deliver an enhanced and more resilient capability for defence

Activity Reference

HFM-365

Panel

HFM

Security Classification

NATO UNCLASSIFIED

Status

Active

Activity type

RTG

Start date

2023-03-13T00:00:00Z

End date

2026-03-31T00:00:00Z

Keywords

Ethic and Legal considerations and framework ELSA, Human Enhancement HE, Human Performance Augmentation HPA, Human Performance Degradation HPD, Human Performance Enhancement HPE, Human Performance Optimization HPO

Background

The increasing complexity of military systems upon which operational success relies presents increasing demands and challenges upon military personnel, both physically, cognitively and mentally (including emotionally). In order to guarantee successful military operations in the future, it is essential to make the military smarter, stronger and more capable. The application of new and/or well-established technologies offer opportunities to artificially increase the performance, endurance and survivability of soldiers when they have to operate in demanding environments, prevent out-of-duty and accelerate return-to-duty after injury or overload. In general, this endeavor to improve human capabilities by ‘artificial’ and ‘normal’ means is called ‘human enhancement’ (HE). There are numerous ongoing human enhancement initiatives initiated in diverse NATO partner countries; also, several relevant reports have been issued, such as: NIAG SG.253 Assessment of Human Augmentation Technologies for Exploitation in the Battlefield (2021), NATO’s Science & Technology Trends 2020-2040 document (2020), HFM-335’s report on Biotechnology, Human Enhancement & Human Augmentation: A Comprehensive Overview of Its Topical Content, as well as the discussion of NATO’s Science and Technology Board on Emerging and Disruptive Technologies (2020). These current insights are based on the results derived from more than a dozen explorative NATO research groups or observations of HE industries, respectively. As such, this RTG proposal is a follow-up to HFM-ST-335-A. Given that considerable effort has already been devoted to scoping the HE field in previous activities, it is proposed to directly start as RTG instead of preceding it with an ET. As there are many HE initiatives in different countries, with the purpose to develop, apply and/or test new and/or the combination of established HE technologies, this RTG offers an opportunity for military commanders and researchers, policy makers and engineers to share their experience in order to improve or enrich their current effort. It will also help NATO to determine the most effective and achievable methods and applications. Recent national HE initiatives span between the application of combined ‘low-hanging-fruit’ HE technologies and testing highly artificial pharmaceuticals, hardware- and biotechnologies. An example of a low-hanging-fruit intervention is the application of personalized, task specific, well-timed and well-portioned higher quality nutrition with optimized measures of rest and recovery before, during, and after demanding education and training exercises to enhance physical and mental performance and to prevent attrition (i.e., Human Performance Optimization). An example of an intervention using highly artificial technologies is the application of the medication ‘Modafinil’ and/or ‘repetitive magnetic transcranial stimulation’ to enhance cognitive performance in a context when alertness, situational awareness and decision making are key for mission success (i.e., Human Performance Enhancement). This initiative may also include focus on current or future research on minimal and maximal abilities- and performance levels, and hence, focusing on greater diversity in the human component to expand the potential recruitment pool to include people with lower basic and/or standard abilities which may be possible to correct/overcome by novel application of biotechnologies and Human Performance Augmentation.

Objectives

In order to guarantee successful military operations in the future, e.g. operate defence systems like drones, robots, and other advanced military technology – including optimal retention and recovery of personnel – it is essential to make the diverse military population smarter, stronger and more capable. To achieve this, HE interventions could possibly play a key role, but differ in applicability, maturity and/or ethical or legal acceptability. Hence, this NATO group aims to apply a holistic research and work group approach comprising three HE directions. This group (1) aims to share, gather and describe lessons learned from recent and future approaches to examine and apply HE technologies in military contexts of education, training, mission preparation, during or even after missions. This NATO group, therefore, seeks to find answers on how to apply context specific, personalized, well-timed, well-designed HE interventions and technologies, how to measure the effect of such HE intervention on military performance, and what are the recommendations for military commanders, researchers, policy makers and engineers in order to make the right decisions on the development and application of HE technologies. Next, this group will (2) discuss HE-technologies – yet not applicable or mature – that might be relevant in the future, with the focus on opportunities, threats, impact and the time the HE technology requires for implementation. Very often, HE technologies are not directly applicable in military contexts due to the lack of an ethical and legal framework and/or the absence of sufficient information necessary for the military. The most recent attempt to develop an ethical and legal framework for the military context is by Lin et.al. (2013). However, since its publication, new technologies have emerged. Moreover, the framework is not fully developed, and as the authors themselves claim, more work is needed to understand how the framework can be implemented to evaluate military enhancements. Therefore, this NATO group will also work (3) on the development and validation of an ethical and legal concept framework for discussing the application of HE interventions in different military contexts. It is the ambition to work on the three Focus Areas in parallel during the NATO group meetings, with the intention to start and end the meetings with combined sessions to achieve synergy. As context is the most important prerequisite to start working on the 3 directions, the group will initiate their work with determining the context of the work that soldiers must undertake in their defence roles by select and describe a number of current or future operational scenario’s.

Topics

HE Technologies, including ethical and legal consideration for application, in the domains of Human Performance Modification (HPM), Human Performance Augmentation (HPA), Human Performance Enhancement (HPE), Human Performance Degradation (HPD), Human Performance Optimization (HPO), Ethic and Legal considerations and framework (ELSA).

Contact Panel Office